NOTE: Evergy electricity pricing 2025

Tariff update requested April and June 2025

Average rate for a constant load, i.e., a 100W light bulb on 24×7

Winter168 Hours per weekSummer
$0.27642 (5.5284)(20 hrs) 11.9048%$0.33803 (6.7606)
$0.1084 (9.3224)(86) hrs 51.16%$0.11628 (10.00008)
$0.04675 (2.8985)(62) hrs 36.9%$0.05633 (3.49246)
$0.10565 (17.7493)avg rate per hour$0.12055

Residential 3 period tariff PDF

As found at:

Requiring a login makes it a challenge to compare. It looks like the weekend vs non-weekend option is the same??? Either way, it appears to be prejudiced against the poor whom often work on the weekends, and do their weekly chores on a weekday. Perhaps let people pick their 2 weekend days?

Yes, I understand that businesses, especially industrial and 9-to-5 offices, often operate only Monday through Friday, so peak usage may occur on actual weekdays; however, that’s not always accurate. Weekends can be heavier on usage for those people’s laundry and shopping. (Okay, stores are open on weekdays, and registers are not used much more on weekends.) Same with opening doors, not a ton of Heat/AC getting out with the heavier traffic, but more bodies are hot. Other than the stay-at-home moms who DO shop weekdays? Plus some other businesses that are higher in power usage and work weekends. i.e., restaurants, gyms/entertainment, etc. Granted, their usage is spread out all day vs just 4-8.

Either way, I still contend, it’s weighted against the poor whose weekends are on weekdays. If they only make up a small percentage of users, then why not let them choose their weekend days?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Coffee: The Cortado across KC

I’ve noticed a wide variety of interpretations across the area for what a cortado is.

Updating soon. I’m just registering my NOTE.
I will specifically add an experience to my charts, and clarify any other wording after I’ve slept on it.

My drink & My order

Let me first preface that I will often order an “8oz Quad Shot Breve” …

… “Like a Double Cortado”

Some people are confused. They’re like “A late?”

“Yes, 50:50 espresso:milk/breve er I’ll take the heaviest cream have if thats cool”

Also:
• No, not an americano, like a cortado
• No, not 4 oz of espresso with a splash of half n half; That would be like a macchiato. Just because its in a cortado glass doesn’t make it a cortado

Just give me a quad shot and fill the rest up with the milk to the 8 oz line. Preferably heavy cream, but Breve {Half n Half} will do since many places won’t heat actual cream.

Just because I say “like a cortado” doesn’t undo the very specific “8oz”.

Why word it like that?

Because many places around town don’t have anything smaller than a 12 oz drink. Plus, many either don’t know what a cortado is, or are just recently learning about a cortado. Caveat, some use the term Gibraltar; “Its the same.”

Oh, yes, more places are adding an 8oz cup, but that’s for something else and often, they still don’t have an 8oz late button. Which means I’m paying for 10 oz of milk, and the upcharge for breve assumes that 10+ oz quantity despite only getting 4oz.

No, technically, its not necessarily the same, but then, that’s kind of the reason I’ve decided to write.
{NOTE: Henceforth, I’ll be using the term Cortado unless I’m comparing a Gibraltar}

Part of the reason I ask that way is because everyone’s definition is different, but also because different coffee house price options vary, and the barista’s often change it up figuring out a decent price. After all, an 8 oz drink with only 4oz of milk/cream should not be costing more than a flavored 12 oz drink. With 8-10oz of milk/cream.

That brings me to my first point.
Why is a breve upcharge the same for 4oz of milk as it is for lets say 12oz of milk? That’s a double shot of espresso and either another double shot, or a couple pumps of flavor.

Some places don’t charge extra for Breve on a Cortado, or will automatically make it a breve “Silky Smooth”.

NOTE: If they make quad cortado with the 2 oz of milk and 4 of espresso, I’d mostly be ok with that. I just would clarify next time. However, 4 oz of espresso with a dab of milk is no longer a cortado… Especially if I say 8oz!

Jump to definitions

Cortado/Gibraltar Chart

Coffee ShopMilkRatioCostCream Option
GoalCream
Breve
50:50Free 🙂
Headrush2%?Skim+ of milk
Almost a Macchiato
$2.69
Crow’s Coffee
“Gibraltar”
Breve50:50
Hi-Tides Coffee??50:50
{Out of cups so its a macchiato today: Several months}
$4
Scooters
“What’s that”
2%
1-3 oz of Cream is often free
Ask saying: With Cream: a couple shot glasses of cream
“Equal amt of cream”
(Default espresso is 3 single oz shots)
Yes will heat heavy cream
Homer’s Coffee House4oz2.95Don’t remember it was 2023, price may now be higher

8oz Quad Shot Breve Chart

ShopOrdered asCostCream Ok?Perfect?
Goals4oz cream/
4oz espresso
Cream over breve
Crow’s Espresso and steamed milk 8oz hot
Extra Shot
(4 total) ($1.50)
Breve ($1.25)
$4.30+ 2.75
$7.05

Up a nickel
in 2024/2025
Yes, Perfect
(Analysis ordering this way saves $1.05 vs 2 cortado’s in one glass)
This works, they have an 8oz option
Crow’sGibraltar
Extra Shot (4 total) ($1.50)
$4.05+1.50
$5.55
NO: It was “Like a Macchiato”
Put 4 shots into a Gibraltar glass with a splash of milk
(Only happened ~3 times in 5 years)
Crow’s Gibraltar
Extra Shot (4 total) ($1.50
$4.00+1.5o
$5.50
Perfect
(2023)
HeadrushSmallCafe Latte
Breve ($0.75)
Xshot ($1.18)
$3.35+$1.93
$5.28
Perfect
p.s. Their cortado is $2.69 but frequently more like a macchiato
Overflow





Double Shot
$1.95
2 1/2 oz.
Lone Shot
Alternative Milk
$0.75
$1.95 + $1.93
$3.88
Perfect. Yes, the owner only charged a double shot; It tasted like a quad (I didn’t watch to verify).
But they up charged the breve to $0.75 — He reentered it in the register 3 times.
Homer’s4 oz espresso – quad$3.50$3.50Yes: Didn’t say like a Cortado, but “lets make it breve… Not sure if you up-charge on 4oz”Perfect: They’ve done this simple 4ox quad several times
Homers Breve 12 $4.03
Add shot $0.72
$4.75
($4.95 Pre Discount)
2023 prices (Gave a BYO Mug discount)
They must not have had an 8oz
See above. They still must not, but they have/had the 8oz cups.

Definitions

Cortado:

Definition 1: A double shot of espresso with an equal amount of Milk & Espresso. Heated cooler than typical lattes (should be shootable).

Definition 2: 1oz foamed milk 2oz espresso
(Per Orbit Visual‘s Poster found in multiple local coffee shops; “updated” is still wrong.)

Gibraltar:

Definition 1: Same as Cortado: Equal amount of milk and espresso with half and half to make it silky. (By Crow’s Coffee Kansas City)

Definition 2: A large macchiato with 2oz espresso & 2oz milk. Heated to 130F vs 140F
(By Kaldi’s Coffee Saint Louis)

Macchiato Definition: Espresso with a Dot of Milk

Learning: what gets, er got me

Caramel macchiato et al is a Caramel Late its not just a dab of milk type of macchiato. However, I suppose, its “marked with” as in Caramel drizzle marked vs in the drink, but a lot more than a “macchiato” shot marked/dab.


I know it’s espresso. The system knows its espresso. I don’t see how an expresso slipped in more than once.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Linux: Some getting used to…

One of the biggest things to get used to is trackpad scrolling. i.e. on a laptop

Pushing fingers from middle to top of the the pad takes me to the top vs pushes the page to the top. I suppose, with touch phones, we’ve gotten so conditioned to push the paper around vs use a scroll bar. This trackpad behavior is so foreign, I believe that M$ Windows has followed suit with the phone/tablet behavior.

NOTE: This is KDE Plasma 5.23 on Slackware15.0

Now that I finally changed it, I am habitually confused. Often subconsiously pulling down to go down. But “Consiously trying to go down

Slackware services & daemons: initd/rc.d vs services

Remember Slackware is traditional. it uses init.d / RD.d << {Slackware Config how-to}; Its a little extra typing, but just call the command via /etc/rc.d/rc.xyz instead of service xyz or systemctl xyz

There was a discussion of switching to runit??? “Not Yet interested”

Discussions: init/rc.cs/systemv/services daemons & controlls:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Come on guys: small self-hosted apache/ WordPress server

The issue should be common enough and at least enough demand.

Isn’t ~user or /user a decently common of a setup for a small personal website? I mean sure, if i go through a big service I can have a virtual host, but,

  • a: they have it pretty much have it setup. Thats http, wordpress, php, nameservice, etc
    (AND the scripts to manage them all)
  • b: they have the experts to walk you though everthing
  • c: they have the experts to program the servers

Me and everyone with my own site selfhosted/home-site/Tiny-Business/Hobby is small time. 10’s vs 100’s a month. 10 of US a month are the people needing help that we can’t get elsewhere. Sure, ten is small, but its also huge because there is no where else for help.

I was about to totally be insecure

Without having a published solution, let alone placing it front n center on the how-to sites for newbies, I was about to totally be insecure. I was like I could just chmod it to 775 or 664, (But that still meant changing the group of the files in my public_html folder).

I kept wondering how sites could do this and still be secure!!!

It would work/be fine with only one user, but then, I might as well just use /var/www.

The issue comes when I want to add a friend, sibling, etc. Now, they would have access to some of my things. Ok, not really, but there’s still a ton of security things file/group ownership. How to run the things in their folder also separately vs the same group or user as my web files.

Why isn’t there at least a mention of it? (The setup how-to’s & errors)

Why isn’t one of the upfront setups a setup for /user or ~user‽
I’ve looked in Apache, WordPress, php, they’re all so confusing. Why? Because no one has published a script/config file for a setup where ~user or /user’s can run scripts as themselves not the default httpd.

FInally found an obscure mention of it. Apache ownership and permissions for wordpress Badically says its insecure, don’t do it. EXCEPT, WHY WHY WHY is it allowed in virtural host setups? ok. let me try setting up <host>/WPsite/ ??? — THIS SHOULD BE AN UP FRONT ANSWER ON How to install WordPress (Via wordpress.org) & Before You Install (Via wordpress.org) the latter links to Changing File Permissions (Via wordpress.org) Unfortuatelly, it casually mentions the insecure/EOL suexec. Ok, it lists all methods:

Popular methods used by sysadmins for this setup are:

  • suPHP, runs through php-cgi, currently unmaintained since 2013.
  • mod_ruid2, apache module, currently unmaintained since 2013.
  • mpm-itk, apache module.
  • mod_fcgid, an Apache module and FastCGI server with more extensive configuration.
  • PHP-FPM, an alternative FastCGI server with shared OPCode, for use with Apache and Nginx.

Again, I’d love to use these options, but I don’t have a DNS name to cause a virtual-host to launch.

Why, it seems like common sense: small multi-user setups do exist

I’m sorry this seems like it should be a common question or set up. I want a small server but I don’t want to host my website in the main server area web server. I want it under my user IE till they user/ or just/ user/.

that way I can have couple of them set up and play around and all that sort of thing, Plus I actually log in to work on some of my sites so it’s not strictly web-based.

the issue I run into is Apache and the PHP files are being run as httpd or Apache or nobody not me as a user but me as a user owns the files

this is a small service or a testing service or whatever so I don’t have a URL for a Patcher to say hey this is a virtual host let’s run it as Xyz in this sandbox

there’s a quote common issue that is often solved by setting permissions better. That setting them correctly is 755 or 644, no it’s not the web server isn’t being run by me the user.

there’s three methods this can be done SU something and something are you ID or something the first one was more secure but depreciated because of its security there’s a second one which hasn’t been appreciated interestingly since the first was supposedly more secure then there is phpf rp

why do I need to go through all that I don’t even know where we’re at

Ways to call a web process as a different user:

  • suPHP run PHP as a user ***DO NOT USE***
    (Depreciated: was EOL by 2014, but still used in 2022. . . 2025 Very rare/only historical)
    • last version suPHP 0.7.2 released 5/20/2013; there is a 0.8.0-pre fork in 2018.
    • Slightly more secure than RUID2:
      in that is builds in some protections i.e. 777/666 protections, and
      starts as the user vs switches to the owner after starting as https’ owner 2
  • mod_ruid2
  • PHP-FPM
    • set php-fpm user and group to website’s owner (NOT SIMPLE/WORKING)
      HOW DO WE TELL apache when to call a particular pool? is “www” the key i.e. the directory parent
      • I misread, I have 2 mpm’s activated (ONLY ONE is allowed); to use PHP-FPM, use mpm_event not mpm_prefork
    • Slackware: THERE IS NO POOL/POOL.D area instead its /etc/php-fpm.d/*.conf
    • TESTING: I setup a <?php echo $username; ?> to see if its working.
      {{Set to a filename.php you know}}
      IT IS PROPERLY SAYING THE USERNAME “apache” 🙂
      Also trying print '<P>' . shell_exec( 'whoami' ) . 'is playing well </p>'; just in case
      Finally a decent test. I DO NOT need a full status of a module {I think}. I just need to see the user its running as. -For now- ; I might eventually need to know if the module is working, but I want to know that its not yet running as x user. Trying to setup the tests were their own issues with dozens of settings when I might not need them.
  • suExec – run CGI as a user (if you run PHP as CGI)
  • mpm_ITK (NOT INSTALLED!!!)

Maybe default setups aren’t using different users???

I took a look at the apache setup samples for vhosts , and none mentioned changing the user.
(Top vhosts page “Apache Virtual Host documentation” on apache.org with 10 links)
Virtual Host examples for common setups

Ok, it is applying by default via virtual host: https://serverfault.com/questions/1118977/configuring-php-fpm-in-apache

ER wait, it is virtual host, but using /var/ as the directory for the VH. This is hardcoding the pool within a VH call. But, its calling the pool via <IfModule mod_fcgid.c> can that be called another way? Normally IfModule’s can be. Hmmm, it seems insecure for a user to name the pool to apply to their directories. ((HENCE, you can’t “load” a module, but if the module is loaded, then… you can call it ???)

Ok, we’re not calling the mod, we’re seeing if its on. the call is for ProxyPassMatch, and no, it can not be called in htaccess

Run as file owner?

CAN’T with php-fpm. YOU MUST USE POOLS:
Apache fast-cgi and php-fpm – Run PHP File as the owner ()
Gotta run as suPHP. or mod_ruip2?

Ok I lost it (OR DID I???), I thought it was VH only, but this is chowning the /www/

Run File as owner: mpm_ITK (Not installed)

Via http://mpm-itk.sesse.net: Some things require Virtual host/ ALl the examples for running as user say in virtual host, but but but then it says this:

MaxClientsVHost can only be set inside a VirtualHost directive; all others can be set wherever you’d like in the Apache configuration, except in .htaccess.

Will AssignUserID: work?
This will cause e.g. /~sesse/foo to be run as the user “sesse” (and /~root/foo to be run as user “root”, so beware!). I guess, don’t have a public_html setup? Also, can /~sesse be sandbox’ed into /public_html. I don’t want access outside of ./public_html?

Can this be used to call a pool as well? It seems like usimg mpm_itk like this will be slow (Non-Threaded) Not that the site is busy enough to need that, but thats the whole point. Be ready to grow as we need without a total rewrite of the settings. SLOW??? but secure at least before we change the user. Each thread, or non-thread/process is isolated.
**Question, is this secure? Can anyone bodge a request /host/docs/~root/**

RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule /~([a-z]+)/ – [E=ITKUID:$1]
AssignUserIDExpr %{reqenv:ITKUID}

NOTE for 2025: as presented by pontikis : How to Run Apache as different User with mpm-itk This was written in 2025, so they’re suggesting “prefork Multi-Processing Module” be used in 2025. Granted with virtual hosts.

Do I need to un-comment this? to do this?

<IfModule mpm_prefork_module>
        #LoadModule cgi_module lib64/httpd/modules/mod_cgi.so
</IfModule>

NOTE userdir within virtual host

You CAN run <userdir> from within a virtual host, but then all users are running via that pool’s user. No different than just setting the /var/http/ to some user. (Insecure) but still requires a virtual host IP/DNS

Some searches:

Why I can’t use a virtual host!

  • I don’t have a domain name (Or not one to point here)
  • I don’t have a fixed IP address (Hence not easy to point DNS here)
  • Localhost doesn’t allow me to view from a second computer on the subnet

NOTE TO SELF: Multi-Site wordpress instalation??? WIll it save disk space?

Stumbled onto this interesting kludge (Two sites for one? “Userdir with Virtual Host (Apache2)

Maybe he’s trying to get around some virtual host call requirement?)

The poster didn’t describe well, and never up-voted an answer.
Userdir with Virtual Host (Apache2) :
Maybe he’s trying to be sneaky in finding a way to change over to virtual hosts so he can add a pool ??? HMMMMM

Is he trying to say:

  • daytime.myhost.com/~user/ >>> /home/user/public_html/
  • nighttime.myhost.com/~user/ >> home/user/public_html2/

Seems easier to say:

  • myhost.com/~user/daytime >>> /home/user/public_html/daytime
  • myhost.com/~user/nighttime >> home/user/public_html/nighttime

MORE UPDATES for wordpress to run smoothly:

  • I guess I’ll have to do some major re-editing once I get a public page. Maybe I’ll VPN with port forwarding till I can get it to do something else? (Yes, a target I suppose?)
  • In the end, instead of playing with running php as, I just:
    • chgrp -R <the wordpress directory> to the apache group,
    • then chmod -R g+w <the wordpress directory>
    • I will probably have to chown as root various files that wordpress might create as apache
      (OR DANGEROUSLY just edit as root. DAMN YOU, you’re trying to make it secure, but you won’t let me AssignUserId to the actual user id be editing as. Now, I’ll be tempted to su into root. I suppose I need to learn to SUDO – it seems to have some restrictions to protect the system. I did just go ahead and give the <user> sudo privlidges, so we’ll see what habit it use.)
  • Increase size of php uploads from 2m to 8m
  • add to the wp-config.php: define('FS_METHOD', 'direct'); /* allow wordpress to update via php */

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Defrag in 2025

Yes, I still have some physical drives.

Yes, NTFS generally doesn’t need defragging, but I’m adjusting some drives – on a slow drive nonetheless, so I want to “Optimize” per Microsoft Windows 10.

I really miss seeing the blocks, or generally, the blocks and continuous areas. It’s a wee bit easier to tell “about” how much progress is needed, and gives the feeling of progress.

I’m currently looking at pass 14; each pass has shown 98% relocated. Are we getting close?

This morning, it was analyzed, saying 0% fragmented, but a manual run 3 hours later showed Needs optimization (12% Fragmented)

A slow drive: 5300 RPM 1TB. I was looking at a 3200+ ms response time. The thing was basically dead. R/W 41 kB/s : 1.4 MB/s at 3255ms & 4.4MBs : 8.5MBs @ 1056 ms

Adjusting, I haven’t used this since November, so I’m adding a Linux/Apache/Logging/backup/etc server, et al.

We’ll see how well it runs Linux. The thing worked great with the SSD. I picked up the SSD because the physical drive was super slow (5300 RPM), but when the SSD failed, I could not justify replacing it since the hinges on the HP (Hewlett-Packard) would no longer stay in place. I’ve replaced the screen’s supports 2x. Half the screws no longer have a place to screw into. It’s also got a decent Graphics Co-processor – Two actually (Intel and Radeon). They are one of the reasons I liked it, especially with the dedicated graphics memory. (I HATE SHARED MEMORY). It helped that I was able to upgrade the memory and add an M2 SSD (Not sure I’m ready for that potential failure again, but I can perhaps see myself upgrading to a faster physical Media HD.

Being a Radeon 5300 series, the GPU wasn’t super fancy, but my new laptop has twice the memory, and the processor performs twice as well. However, the memory, being shared with the graphics system, makes it super subpar. (I HATE SHARED MEMORY) Keeps causing hiccups and pauses. Plus, it’s just Intel’s built into the processor one. I sure miss the way the old system utilized both. Photo & Video editors both used them along with Steam, and ???. It was super Zippy

p.s. Windows Defragmenter, “Optimize Drives”, is now up to pass 19.

NOTE: I opted for a ThinkPad; hopefully, this is more durable than the HP one. It does have a spill-protected keyboard, but alas, do I care given the lack of a dedicated memory GPU.

QUESTION: Is there an M2 GPU that can be added to this laptop‽!!! Especially with dedicated memory!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I-70 Project KCMO

I am not finding the project here Maybe its the Prospect Bridge replacement? Its supposed to be a 3 mile swath between Prospect and Van Brunt. They are supposed to be removing a couple of exits, and I guess making it “beautiful”, and hopefully, Giving us on-ramps with room to merge, AND AND AND, hopefully, they will have provisions for a train. I’d hate to spend a ton of money only to tear it all up in 6 years so we can send a train from downtown to the sports complex or farther. Independence center, and blue springs will be great destinations along with a few stops in between. I’m not sure if its still set aside, but Blue Springs set aside land for it way back in 2020-2005. Probably hoping Clay Chastain’s bill that passed in 2005/2006 would come out there eventually.
https://www.modot.org/active-projects-directory

Sorry, Not a complete story. I just wanted to lock in my view before the project go too far along.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chiefs in Kansas City: loyalty and commitment

About six weeks ago, early March 2024, I talked to someone who was supposedly connected to the Kansas City Chiefs inner circle. They said the Chiefs were not tied to KC and were definitely seeking options outside the city.

The reason “The Fans Spoke”
My reply was “Good riddance! The Chiefs think that, then they must be stupid!”

Why? Because the Chiefs are playing games, are giving mixed signals, and threatening the fans and taxpayers. The Royals did that and ended up getting a NO vote. Of course, the Royals had multiple other reasons for a NO vote, with their sketchy back-and-forth only being one part of it.

Continued Below


NOTE: Why the Royals’ April 2024 vote failed…

  1. Sketch last-minute changes
    (We were told about a NKC & an East Village option)
  2. Kansas City loves the K!!!
    1. Fans and the City are upset that Sherman does not respect the Kaufman family and legacy. The city feels Sherman has not earned his own legacy yet.
    2. The City/County/State has developed a nice stadium that the fans love. They feel that the Shermans are irresponsible with the money they have been given to maintain the K. Citizens/Taxpayers feel that the funds were squandered to encourage building a new stadium as Sherman’s “PET PROJECT!!!”
  3. The ’24 proposal destroys a neighborhood!
    1. Already, grassroots redeveloped
    2. Multiple businesses told us we don’t care about you
    3. Tons of extra money spent to buy out property owners
      (Sketch with most proposed locations)
    4. New building still under tax breaks
    5. No compassion for the art district/arts

        You alienated three groups of people: Lovers of the K, Art lovers & business owners, and fiscally responsible people


    Back to the Chiefs

    The person told me that “The citizens ‘spoke’ [Voted NO] and didn’t want to pay for the Chiefs’ stadium.” To which I countered. “Um, NO, the citizens voted NO to the Royals plan:”

    • We don’t want to pay for a baseball stadium downtown
    • We don’t want to leave Kauffman
    • We don’t… (See the above list)

    “IF the Chiefs had kept to the original plan they requested, the Chiefs’ vote would have been a YES”

    What was this Chiefs’ request? A 20-year plan with upgrades to Arrowhead. We, the citizens, are willing to make Arrowhead amenities world-class. Yes, Locker rooms et al.

    Instead, the Chiefs were attached to a 40-year plan with double the funds. They didn’t request a new stadium, but rather a bunch of pet projects due to double the funds. THESE PET PROJECTS were not included in the Chiefs’ requests from April/July 2023 to December 2023. Instead, the pet projects were added when they got attached to the high dollar Royals’ plan.

    The problem is, in 20 years, halfway through the 40-year tax, we would still be paying for these pet projects. A 20-year tax lets us reassess needs and build the Chiefs a new stadium if needed in 20 years.

    Instead, the April 2024 tax, while not a higher [“new”] tax, it is a NEW 40-year tax for the same assessment. Being both long and not covering a new Arrowhead, it would lead to a new tax not only on Arrowhead in 20 years, but most likely a new tax on new upgrades to the new 2029 Royals stadium in 20 years.

    Changing plans/Scatter Brained requests

    Now that the initial commingled Royals vote was rejected, the Chiefs are getting greedy. Their new proposals are now putting forth both all the pet projects they added last minute to the Royals vote, but also a new stadium.

    The fans LOVE Arrowhead just like they love the K, and it seems the Chiefs do too, as they initially only requested upgrades.

    Not only is it a great stadium that’s built well, but rebuilding may mean we will lose our status as the Loudest stadium in the NFL, as league leadership may require sound-dampening acoustics in a new stadium.

    Thus, looking at the Royals proposal, while not a “New [second/increased tax]” today, the tax proposal of April 2024 will result in one down the road due to its length and lack of maintenance provisions.
    i.e., instead of including 40 years of maintenance, it included pet projects today

    I am still only quoting the Royal proposal because the Chiefs have not put forth a [reasonable] plan since their 2023 proposal, and subsequent commingled royal plan/vote. Instead, they are playing voters/fans against each other, having governments bid against each other for the worst plan that fans might get.

    Worst??? Yes, the highest priced replacement for Arrowhead with taxpayer and fan dollars. Not only will taxpayers be on the hook, but fans will have to pay higher prices to cover these NEW TAXES.

    Finally, when the Chiefs were called out for these missteps, they threatened the citizens with moving rather than making a proper request.


    Conclusion

    • The Chiefs made a 180 request at the last minute vs the previous proposal of April(?) July(?) to December 2023 request.
    • They attached to a poor plan/the Royals vote
    • The Chiefs added pet projects when they joined the Royal Plan
    • The 40-year plan vs the 20-year one didn’t include maintenance plans
    • They disenfranchised fans and voters by claiming those groups didn’t want the Chiefs after voting no on the joint Royals plan.
    • Extreme disenfranchisement and hostage holding: Not only did they claim the fans and voters didn’t want to play ball, they further disenfranchised the groups by threatening to move not only out of the city, county, and state, but even out of the Kansas City Metro Area.
    • They are getting greedy: Having fans and governments outbid each other puts taxpayers on the hook for a fancy stadium that fans, taxpayers, nor the Chiefs asked for. Depending on the proposal, the taxpayers will pay outright, and on others, the fans will pay more to cover STAR taxes that will probably be paid for from the taxpayers’ general funds when costs aren’t fully funded from the STAR portions.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Royals Stadium!!!

    If the Kansas City Royals want to move downtown, why put a horrible location on the ballot?

    The crossroads is a location that requires destroying buildings and businesses that helped redevelop the area. They kept teasing us with an east village plan only to do a shady last minute change.

    If they want the crossroads, go east of 71. Check this out: a 4×4 block area vs. a 3×3 block area. That’s 12 vs. 9 square blocks. Actually, 4x the size.

    Benefits!!!

    • Close to P&L
    • Doesn’t destroy Businesses
    • Mostly City owned property
      • KCATA bus barn (16.17 Acers + 3.36 in empty land= 19.53 Acers)
      • KC Schools VoTech Campus “KCPS: Manual Career Tech Center”. The Royals promised funding for KC Schools, and were going to pay dozens of businesses to move, how about build a state-of-the-art VoTech campus on one of hundreds or dozens of Vacant KC Public School properties, and let the thriving businesses continue as is vs telling businesses we don’t care about all the hard work you did not only to survive, but to redevelop a depressed area (The crossroads 2000-present). (16.48 Acres Including fields)
      • 1.74 Acres Full Employment Council + a vacant city park with unmarked acres
      • .72 acres for KC P&L/Evergy
      • 38.47 Total Acres, not counting 4.74 acres along the NE edge for a school, church, and two businesses.
      • VS  The proposed 18-acre development spanning from Grand Boulevard east to Locust Street, and Truman Road south to 17th Street.
      • VS One Pershing Square Location at 2301 Main St (6.14 acres)/Washington Square Park (4.75 acres) at 100 E Pershing Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108 (2301 Main St. Previous headquarters for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City) Total Acres: 10.89 acres. Directly connected to Main Street Street-Car line, and KC Terminal Railway, but not near or directly connected to ANY highways. Also cuts off OK St, and potentially Grand Blvd, based on the renderings. OK St is a main supply line to Union Station, and bypass for events on Main, Grand, and Pershing Streets.
    • 18th and Vine Brings baseball back to its roots:
      • The KC Municipal Stadium was 4 blocks south, and 7 blocks east
        2123 Brooklyn Ave, Kansas City, MO 64127
      • The Baseball Museum is immediately across Paseo, and moving west to be directly south of 18th street
    • Within a block of a Major entertainment district 18th and Vine, while still within 6 blocks of the previously proposed crossroads location
    • 10 Times better highway access:
      • East and West I-70 exits from Paseo (Northeast edge of project)
        Plus other exits off of I-70 east along Truman as well as 18th St, 21st St, and 23rd St
        (East and South edges of project)
      • 9 blocks straight south off of Southbound I35 & Paseo exit (Northeast edge of project)
      • 1 Block from Northbound 71 Highway/I49 Exit for Truman Rd (Northwest edge of project)
      • 4 blocks north of Northbound 71 Highway/I49 Exit for 22nd Street (Southwest edge of project)
      • 5 blocks north of Northbound 71 Highway/I49 Exit for Paseo (Southeast edge of project)
    • Great Public Transit options:
      • On 18th St, a proposed East/West streetcar line directly connects to the existing Main St line and continues to numerous Southwest Boulevard & Crossroads businesses.
        (Also 2 blocks from the crossroads: 18th St and Truman St edges)
      • 5 blocks from the East Village Transit Center: In addition to direct Park ‘n Ride options, a circular can be established through there, Power & Light, and The Crossroads.
      • Troost is experiencing a major renaissance throughout its length, and has a max line.
      • With the extra room, it can have a dedicated stop along any true light rail lines added along eastbound I-70, or the right of way for the KC Terminal Railway Corridor along 20th St.
      • Additional Development opportunities West of Troost (7.37 acres) and north of Truman Road (5.22 acres). NOT COUNTING city-owned “Streets” between lots.
    Comparison of the Crossroad and 18th and Vine locations.
    The green highlight is additional development or parking options.
    Blue is the Baseball Museum (East/Right Current; South/Bottom is new).
    Yellow is the East/West exits off of I70 at Paseo.
    Top: Left of green is the Truman exit off of 71/49,
    4 and 5 blocks south of Orange is the 22nd Street & Paseo exits from 71/49.
    9 blocks north of orange is the Paseo exit off of southbound I35
    Directly east is the Benton, 21st, and 23rd street exits off of I-70
    The Crossroads Proposed Stadium for Scale
    KC Terminal Railway and nearby properties without buildings, in case that is ever used for a light rail line, versus I-70 right of way.

    For Reference:

    Posted in blogging, Kansas City, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

    daylight savings time!!!!

    today is March 9. that means we switched back to daylight savings time. (summer time) I am so glad to finally have more evening light.

    i understood many people like the change, and that during the deepest darkest days of winter we don’t want kids going out to school an hour before the sun comes up. of course we just shift it so it’s also dark-ish for them coming home.

    to continue that thought, when we’ve gone to permanent summer time, we opted to change back fairly quickly. with that in , in mind I hear people say we have modern power and ammenaties so it shouldn’t matter. ok, quid pro quo, it shouldn’t matter as much the other way either.

    pendimg other notes below, let’s bite the middle bullet and just further shorten the standard time period. thus keeping it to the deepest harshest part of the year. we’re already doing that in the fall. we’re only under standard time for about 7 weeks before the winter solstice, yet 11 or so after that’s 4 extra weeks when we’re suffering from the winter blues.

    i propose that we move it at least 2 weeks if not 3 or 4 weeks earlier. instead of the 2nd Sunday of March, how about the 4th Sunday of February, or the Sunday following the 15th. that’s essentially the 3rd Sunday unless it’s early I. e. not the day after Valentine’s day. that way you’re not recovering from both at once.

    speaking of Valentine’s day, heck, do we want it before or after? make it a romantic night out by extending the day deeper into the night. what better way to reset?

    people are forgetting, half the country is already following East Coast time. ever notice when you’re watching tv, the shows start at 9/8central. yea, 6 pm news is at 5 in the Midwest; the late night news is at 10 instead of 11. we don’t work 9 to 5 we work 8 to 5. ok, some lucky people work 8 to 4, and yet others are 7 till.

    speaking of the rest of the country, that 9 to 5 East Coast time is 6 to 2 Pacific, but that works great, half can work the early shift while the rest can answer your phones till 11pm. noon till 8 is 3 till 11 east Coast. yet, they can still have an evening to enjoy, cand a morning to sleep in.

    2024/2025

    nov 3>10>17>24>dec 1>8>15>22(7wks);

    dec 22>29>Jan 5>12>>19>26>feb2>9(7wks)>16>23> march2>9(11wks)

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Kansas City proposed new metered parking city-wide: January 2025

    Recent notice from Kansas City of new Street Parking policies. See the quote below (Still waiting to see the word from the city i.e., Press release, news article, or proposal/bill/ordinance)

    The city is currently planning to introduce metered parking across the metro area, and it will include Westport, Country Club Plaza, residential neighborhoods nearby and in midtown, and other areas (18 & Vine, Crossroads, downtown nights and weekends, and areas near streetcar). As a Volker resident and/or business owner, would you like metered parking? Residential parking permits are apparently not being considered or offered for this metered parking expansion. Please cast a yes or no vote in the comments, and add any questions or comments you have. Several of us are meeting with the city tonight to discuss.

    Edited to add: this will generate at least 4 revenue streams for the city – parking meter fees, parking tickets, towing and city tow lot storage fees, and revenue from auctioning towed vehicles after 30 days (no title required to auction).

    Ken Williams Volker Neighborhood Discussion Group


    My response:

    thus encouraging options other than driving. No matter the system, we must ensure neighbors can still park and use the system. Neighborhood/resident identifiers/passes are essential in this plan. Of course, these businesses need non-residents to be able to patronize their establishment, too.


    The details

    I’d like to see more loading zones.

    You mention towing. Unfortunately, the city is not considering this enforcement to help the citizens. Otherwise, they’d already be enforcing these things. With loading zones, we reduce the frequency of guests parking on crowded streets.

    There are numerous zones that look like 11th and Main where the 3 or so loading zone spots in front of Cosentinos are always full of cars “Parked for the night.”

    These would be a viable pickup location for revelers in power & light as well as visitors to the grocery. Not just people that stayed oh 5 minutes too long to do a quick pickup of milk, but people parked for hours.

    We’re in an age where people take rideshare/cabs more than ever, yet instead, we say “drive.” Both by creating more parking and eliminating easy pickup and drop-off options. If there’s a bar or restaurant on the block, heck, a corner store, pharmacy, or high-density apartment on the block, there should be a loading zone within said block, and it should be enforced.

    But, BACK TO YOUR QUESTION, what’s the problem, and what’s the solution?

    Like above, I definitely like various time restrictions. 5-30 Minutes, 2 hours, 3-??? hours. In many areas, the issue seems to be people parking along the route to go to other places.

    Until we have a streetcar everywhere, people will drive to it and park to leave from there.

    I have thought about a supplement for pickups/dropoffs at intermodal points. Whether that is a discount to the passenger and/or a bonus to the driver who’s driving 5-12 minutes at a low ride density area vs. 12-30 minutes from a high-density venue like P&L, that seems like a great solution.

    Granted, where does that payment come from?
    People parking?
    Bus fares if they return?
    How close should the parking fees start?

    If it’s too close, people will just walk 3 or 4 blocks to save. After all, that’s why they’re parking there instead of downtown.

    How does that pay-to-park system compare to a time-based system?

    A 3 to 5-hour time limit makes sense. Consider the ride. A 4-hour limit means waiting and riding the streetcar affords them the ability to party for what, 3 hours?

    Yet, 4 hours also means someone can visit local things for 4 hours. NOTE: Per the America Nightlife Association, the average number of drinks per visit is 2.3. In theory, that means 1-3 hours of drinking plus, ideally, at least one of recovery.
    (P.s. KC is discouraging neighborhood taverns. See my opinion that)

    Ultimately, I think neighborhood passes should exist as they have in Volker and other neighborhoods.

    However, I also think that something should be allotted to employees and visitors of the local businesses. A QR code that can be scanned so patrons can get 2 hours of parking and employees 10?

    In consideration, WHAT IS THE GOAL?
    Along West 39th, encourage people to use the garage? Vs.
    Elsewhere, not be a leech that prevents other patrons from visiting the businesses while the leech goes elsewhere.
    P.S….. double-edged sword; most concerts are long enough that a 3-hour parking time encourages parking elsewhere. Yes, that same 3-hour limit is also a bad time for bar patrons if they need to spend that 3rd hour sobering up. “On average.”

    Notable, I used the Park KC app, which never warned about ballooning prices. I’m not sure if that was not in effect or not that night, but the signs warned it COULD BE. How do I know there is an event and if it will balloon.

    That said, perhaps the app should be proactive. “Are you going to XYZ event?” “There is a garage/lot two blocks closer that has room and is $XX.XX. Then, the bar patron could scan the QR code if they’ve purchased at least two drinks and they are still there after 2 hours.

    I will admit there might not be an app that does this, but it might be worth it if there is a request. I’m sure other cities & private lot operators utilize these apps. Thus, up-selling to customers & owners who want it while freeing up parking in areas where different customers and owners want is a win-win for the app.

    Posted in The road, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment