Public Transit & traffic lights-timing

I believe that there needs to be an improvement in public transit in New Orleans. An improvement means more jobs both at the RTA, but in the city as a whole.

Many recovery dollars should be or should have been spent to make sure proper systems were installed rather than just old style antiquated systems. — I’m talking mostly about the traffic lights; any new bus can be computerized. We now have electronic payment systems including day passes –. Heck, the entire Canal & Tulane Ave systems probably had to be replaced. I sure hope they are compatible with smart systems or we can use them somewhere making room for smart system.

Anyway, on with the needed improvements. Many cities across the country have changed the way the buses and trains interact with the lights. Rather than the lights controlling the buses, the buses control the lights.

If a bus can head down canal and make it through the light just before it turns rather than after, you can acheve many things.

  • Improved and controlled bus timing
  • Buses don’t have to wait through an extra light cycle because.
    • They can’t make it to the bus stop before the light turns red
    • Riders are still boarding/disembarking when the light turns red
  • Buses can take off before the light turns green. Thus they don’t fight with traffic, and can make it to the next light quicker.
  • Vehicles can actually turn right on red because they are not going around and in front of a stopped bus.

All of which improves the reliability and timing of the buses. With these improvements, ridership improves, and more employees can be hired further improving the system and ridership. Finally a better transportation system means more businesses in town, and more locals at work both for the RTA and other businesses.

EDIT: I don’t even mind if the extra lane is a public transit lane i.e. bikes + buses, and possibly cabs. (if they earn it)

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pedestrian traffic-intersections & traffic lights

I have two major suggestions involving the area around the French Quarter, an area of public disgrace where people from all over the country see how run down the city is. Is that the goal? I hope not. What we need is a green arrow at the intersections where pedestrians and vehicular traffic get separate dedicated signals and crossing times. Plus we need to make sure all the lights-specifically the pedestrian signals working. **I’ve added another improvement in the body text as well.

New Orleans is an interesting town. Its a blast from the past. We have a ton of pedestrian traffic, and a good amount of car traffic, people jay-walk, cars don’t stop for pedestrians, pedestrians don’t make way for cars, and you almost have to put up with one if you put up with the other.

You see, here, you must be both aggressive and uber cautious. Uber-Cautious because people are aggressive, don’t signal, and in general don’t respect the other (cars>people & people>cars).

Two major instances where being aggressive is a must for cars.

First Bourbon Street, if you are going to make it across Bourbon Street, you must move forward a foot when you get enough room to move forward. If you don’t, you will never make it across as there is constant foot traffic all across the street, and its never regulated.

Second, at lights along Canal St and Decatur. The pedestrians have a dedicated light to go on, but often when they see the green light for cars, they ignore the RED light for pedestrians. If more than one or two of the ten plus cars at a light are going to make it through the light, the cars must push there way through the pedestrian traffic or some will end up waiting through 5 cycles of the light.

I do have a suggestion. Bourbon St. has no solution other than closing the Quarter to automotive traffic. However, at the lights we can improve the situation. We could add a strobe to the light when the traffic light is green and the pedestrian light is RED, or a cheaper, less distracting, and over all better move is to add a green arrow so the pedestrians know that the turning cars have the right away. They should be less likely to go if they see a green arrow vs. a green light.

Finally, these lights never work right, so how can you expect the pedestrians to follow the working lights let alone the broken ones. I’ve called 311 numerous times. When I say they don’t work right, some are burned out, but quite a few have both the walk  and don’t walk lights on at the same time all the time. For some reason, they fix the auto lights quicker than the pedestrian lights.

In conclusion, we need a green arrow at the intersections where pedestrians and vehicular traffic get separate dedicated signals and crossing times. Plus, we need to make sure all the lights-specifically the pedestrian signals working. Finally a closure of the quarter to vehicular traffic.

NOTE: I mention a possible closure of the quarter to vehicular traffic. This issue has been discussed many times, and thus I am not pushing it. It would be feasible as people entering the quarter would need to be making a delivery–during certain hours; going to an off street parking spot–with monthly pass, residential permit, or hotel reservation. Several things that make this possible would be pedi-cabs and/or the rail line down Royal &/or Charters from canal to ??? (This rail is a mini-rail like the one in city park, but for adults. Both of which has been discussed and plans presented to the City Council), and finally no street parking.  —- None of these I really like as I frequent the quarter, and generally park on the street. —- This may be a burden on residents and visitors to the quarter and well as neighboring neighborhoods where cars may end up parking. —- The plus for this is that the majority of the people in the area staying in hotels, and not driving.

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NOLA Transportation Improvements

I have a little multi-part series on Transportation improvements for the new Orleans area:

And future stories such as regional/national rail, and more.

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

NOLA Transportation Improvements – St Charles

Saint Charles is the second major tourist destination in New Orleans behind the French Quarter.

It is how people get to the Garden district, Autobon park, the Zoo, the Universities, the River Bend and Carrollton area, and an alternate route for those heading to The Magazine St. Corridor.

Many people are downtown for conventions, business and social or recreational travel, but many end up taking the St. Charles streetcar. These people are not just visitors, but locals heading to or from home weather thats along St. Charles or the opposite side of town.

The problem is people can not rely on the street car. The St. Charles line in particular is extremely unreliable. I frequently see 5 cars lines up in a row. That is 50 minutes of cars that should have been coming every 10 minutes. Yes, people have been waiting an hour or more, so I know its not just double coverage.

My suggestions below include some harder to justify and/or implement items, and thus may need refining, but something needs to be done, and if we can improve the corridor lets do it! In the end, I hope it being edgy does not devalue any of my other posts.

What follows is an improvement that addresses the issue two fold, and each helps the other. One of the major issues slowing down the street cars is vehicular traffic. That same vehicular traffic also holds up vehicular traffic.

The key is to keep the vehicular traffic from affecting the other methods of transit i.e. public, bike, pedestrian. One method is to reduce the vehicular traffic by encouraging other methods. i.e. public, bike, pedestrian. The other is to make said vehicular traffic flow better.

In an effort to encourage public transit, we must ensure the Streetcars run not only on time but in a timely manor. If they are not constantly stopping for cars they can run every ten minutes, as well as cut the total time it takes to make the entire route. Both of which encourages ridership.

The method we can ensure that the streetcars are not continuously stopping for cars is to limit and control there ability to turn left. Thus we should reduce the number of cross over points, and add a left turn/u-turn light this is not a full light, and while expensive, there numbers are limited due to the reduction in left turn points.

This means we must have dedicated left turn lanes. Not a big issue since traffic on St. Charles is already almost always blocked in the left lane because cars are backed up either waiting on a streetcar, or waiting to complete a turn.

Wow we’ve already fixed two problems. Cars can now know they can actually drive on St. Charles, and the Streetcars can actually run on time. Because they are on time, people may actually be able to rely on them when heading to work, and not have to wait an hour only to ride another hour. Heck we are a small city a two hour trip to work is uncalled for.

Now since we are down to one lane on St. Charles, we can utilize the former other lane for bicycle traffic. NOTE: I said the former lane…. I mean use nearly the entire width of the right lane for bikes. Slightly smaller so cars don’t try to use it. This improves capacity, for the bikes, and gives added protection from dooring and This means that occasionally–at the areas reserved for left turn lanes–we will have to do away with parking. I don’t advocate totally removing street parking as we should keep parking available for the smaller local neighborhood businesses. But since we are encouraging less car traffic it makes sense to remove some.

To further improve the timing along the route for public transport, see my other post on Public Transit & traffic lights-timing.

The biggest caveat for this plan is the shifting lanes. Cars may continue into the turn lane when they want to go strait or use the bike lane past the turn zone. We can easily remind the cars to shift lanes with vertical plastic traffic guides. Another option is to actually have the bikes use the left lane. and shift/shrink the bike portion at the turn zones. – Just must respect the left turning traffic or be sandwiched between the two traffic lanes.

NOTE: We may still want to offload some traffic Automobile and Bike to nearby roads, but being a busy road makes it safer for crime issues rather than having someone riding down a dark & quiet adjacent street. Especially when we are trying to encourage people visit the businesses on St. Charles via bike rather than always taking there car.

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, The road | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Rail Transportation in New Orleans

I believe that New Orleans should add a rail line to the city. We must show the world that we are eco-friendly. Something we are totally not currently expressing in numerous ways, but for now lets focus on Rail.

We have a dead Downtown CBD. There is no call for this. We have a vibrant entertainment district the French Quarter nearby. I believe there are several solutions for improving the CBD occupancy rates, and help the over all economy including tourist economy.

The big issue with commercial rentals, the major player in CBD’s around the nation — hence the name Central Business District –, is employee housing. Sure you can do mixed use, but obviously that is not being done. Increasing incentives for residential units downtown would play a role, but getting back to the title of this post, getting people into the city from the burbs via rail is the ultimate solution for the local culture.

That culture is 1-4 unit housing (Singles/Doubles/etc). People have proven that they want to still be near New Orleans, and have moved to the north shore.

The north shore is a 20+ mile drive mostly without any exits. That’s 29 miles on I-10 from Old Spanish Trail Rd  to Poydras; add 5 miles for Door to Door. That’s 18+ miles between Slidell and the first New Orleans East Exit.

I am only going to focus on Slidell to the CBD for now:

  • First, the bridge required is short. The crossing of lake Pontchartrain where it is narrow near Lake Borgne, and a little bit of swamp vs. ~28 miles at the Causeway (sure if the bridge can be easily added to, it may be feasable)
  • Second, one of the two structures of the twin span is still intact, and was being used for traffic. This could easily be adapted for train use even if used only temporarily to prove feasibility and/or while a permanent structure is built.
  • Third. There is talk of removing the Elevated I-10 Claiborne expressway bridge With or without a bridge, lets give residents, employees, and visitors an alternate way to enter the city.
  • Fourth, an additional egress to move people north. Even though we would still need to use buses to get evacuees north of Slidell, it would minimize the congestion, traffic, and delays of buses picking up in the city.
  • Fifth, if built, Mississippi can and would most likely at least look into extending the rail line to the Mississippi Gulf coast tourism district.
    • Something they spend a lot of money on.
    • This could help fill New Orleans hotels in quiet times.
    • Off load overflow during busy times
    • Add a viable airport to New Orleans (Gulfport)
    • Give people thinking about visiting another reason to choose NOLA
    • Eventually bring Mobile into the Metro Area — Making us an easier destination for much of the gulf coast who does not want to bring a car to New Orleans.

You could use dedicated lanes and highways for a bus like they do in Texas, but Rail is the solution that investors know they can count on not going away with the flick of a pen in the future. Plus rail in the end becomes more energy efficient, and that is important as we realize petrol fuels becoming an issue over the next 20 years.

Actually, I think that pretty much says it.

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I-10 Lane adjustment @ Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge

Some of this may help solve issues with the Claiborne Flyover bridge.

I am not going to actually discuss the removal of the Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge– See why in the conclusion paragraph of this post.

Instead, I am going to address improvements to the traffic flow. Most of the improvements to traffic flow are with the idea that through I-10 traffic should be going East via I-610. Instead, the traffic on I-10 over Claiborne should only be in the area to be going downtown. Downtown being the CBD, French Quarter, Tulane, and Treme. Preferial traffic could easily be going to:

  • Mid City*
  • Bywater*
  • lower 9th Ward*
  • Uptown/Garden District (including Central City)  via Claiborne South*
    * Much of which can also be gotten to via Carrollton Ave, City Park Ave, Elysian Fields Ave

Now how do we adjust the lanes

  • First, heading east on I-10 at the Poydras exit (#234B), the left lane should be EXIT ONLY.  After all we are encouraging people to go Downtown/to the CBD/the Superdome.
  • Second, that leaves a single lane of I-10 heading east. This lane becomes the center lane on the Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge allowing Lake bound traffic on the Pontchartrain Expressway heading to I-10 east extra room to merge. Thus also allowing Poydras to I-10 east room to merge as well. This also helps solve the issue of Pontchartrain Expressway traffic doing a dangerous merge via the Claiborne Flyover
  • Third, is to optionally make the last French Quarter (FQ) exit “exit only”-Esplanade. By making this exit only, it further encourages traffic to flow into Downtown (the FQ). It also encourages those entering I-10 via Poydras and the Pontchartrain Expressway to clear out of the right lane.
    Why is this important? Because there is already so much traffic in the right lane exiting that many people Exiting at Esplanade and Claiborne North stay in the center lane hoping the person next to them exits at Orleans or Esplanade so they have room to get into the right lane.
  • Optionally, the exit only at Esplanade could be Claiborne North.

In the end, we have 2 through lanes on I-10 east. With it narrowed down to one lane at Poydras since all traffic should be heading downtown, and reduced traffic along with extended merge lanes helps with over all traffic flow in the area.

Further work can be done by connecting I-610 to the Pontchartrain Expressway. This way CCC traffic does not clog up the Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge, and when the bridge is removed, even if its just for repairs/rebuilding, Claiborne and overall traffic is manageable in the area.

The final solution is to put a rail system in.

for or against permanently removing the Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge. The damage to the Treme has already been done, and the neighborhood will never be the same. However, with the above suggestions, it should make the preparation for the removal and/or repairs smooth. It leaves the Pontchartrain Expressway (I-910 or I-49) with ramps to South Claiborne (north and southbound), Poydras, and possibly the French Quarter (after all it is a major route to cross Canal During Carnival Season)

Much info can be found on the removal topic by searching Google: Elevated I-10 Claiborne Expressway bridge

Make Poydras exit only on I-10 East (leaving I-10 a single lane)

Single Lane I-10 gives the Pontchartrain Expressway ramp room to merge

Single Lane I-10 gives the Pontchartrain Expressway ramp room to merge

Currently you have 5 Lanes of traffic merging into 5, and 3 ramps on top of one another - Plus 4 more less than a mile further

Currently you have 5 Lanes of traffic merging into 5, and 3 ramps on top of one another - Plus 4 more less than a mile further

Exit only at Orleans, Esplanade, or N Claiborne -- 4 ramps in less than 3200 feet.

Exit only at Orleans, Esplanade, or N Claiborne -- 4 ramps in less than 3200 feet.


Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Claiborne flyover fix

Double white line begins before Pontchartrain Expressway ramp merges

I don’t know how many of you have noticed, but there is a double white line heading north on the Claiborne flyover that starts shortly before the Pontchartrain Expressway merges into Claiborne Northbound.

Notice The short Merge point, and that there are 3 lanes merging, with 2 lanes for I-10 & Claiborne gets its own lane (See lane change link)

Notice I say merges into Claiborne Northbound. Pontchartrain Expressway Lake bound has its own ramp to I-10 east. Pontchartrain Expressway River bound is I-10 at this point. There is a double white line telling people not to cross after Pontchartrain Expressway joins Claiborne. Plus, there is a sign on the right edge with an arrow saying I-10 Strait ahead…. NOT ANGLED LEFT.

Notice the short distance between the two ramps -- The reason for the double white line.

View from the vehicle merging. See how it could be a cluster #*!?, and accident waiting to happen.

The view back after continuing down Claiborne.

Instead, we have people crossing from the far right lane to the far left lane. Crossing the double white line and multiple lanes of traffic. This is extremely unsafe. That’s right, It is an accident/wreck waiting to happen.

I have called the state, city, and CCC (Cresent City Connection), and no one wants to own it. Within the past 12 months:

  • Under the Nagan administration NOPD says it crosses two wards, and the traffic division is not patrolling the highway. They will respond to specific incidents, but not a general traffic control issue.
  • They also said the State Highway patrol is not doing enforcement within the City of New Orleans. (Jefferson Parish always transfers saying I-10 is the HP’s Jurisdiction)
  • However, a suggestion was made to contact the CCC as they maintain and enforce the CCC bridge, Pontchartrain Expressway and all ramps leading up to and away from it all the way to 10. (and further as its still called the Pontchartrain Expressway?)

When I called the CCC, the police didn’t take my call, and the maintenance department said they could put up a sign. But there was no follow through on how to make it happen. There is still no sign.

There are 3 steps that can be taken to help fix the issue.

I believe a sign is the first step. Not everyone is aware that crossing the double white line is illegal, and others believe the line must be a relic as there is no enforcement, and everyone is doing it. Adding a sign will bring it to there attention and let them know its still in effect.

The second step is to do some enforcement. Only a few sessions of a few hours each scattered one week weaning down over a month/year will do wonders. Once initially enforced, only a few hours a year of random enforcement is all that would be required–mostly complaint driven. Yes its hard as there is not much space, but it’s possible:

  • Before the ramp flag people down.
  • Radio ahead and flag down after the merge.
  • Pursue via motorbike.

Third, permanent plastic traffic marker between the two lines of the double white line. (another sample)

Fourth, adjust the lane assignment on I-10 east and the Pontchartrain Expressway merge onto I-10. I discuss this in my I-10 East lane adjustment post.

Of course, this whole issue would be moot if there were a ramp from the Pontchartrain Expressway to I-610 East, and/or there were no Elevated I-10 Claiborne expressway bridge

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Road and Lane improvement: Palmetto at Carrollton, New Orleans, LA

There are several roads in New Orleans that need improvement, and the one brought to top attention is the intersection Palmetto at Carrollton, New Orleans, LA.

The issue at hand is what lane do you turn into. Generally accepted practice is that the nearest lane turns into the nearest available lane. The difference here is that there are two lanes. Begging the question, where does the second lane turn to? Typically if I am in the second turning lane, I give as much room as possible to the first lane i.e. I’ll space it out one lane (or half a lane) so that people who can’t get entirely into the first lane while turning don’t hit me, yet not all the way to the far end so as to allow left turning vehicles coming from the other direction to turn.

That leads to confusion here. While there is a shoulder, right turning vehicles in the right most lane of Palmetto jut out into the second right most lane on Carrollton. I have tried turning from both lanes. When in the right most lane, I have trouble getting into the second right most lane to get onto the Interstate heading west. However, when in the second right most lane on Palmetto, I also have trouble getting into the second right most lane to get onto the Interstate heading west–because those in the right most lane randomly fill both lanes. Thus I end up turning at the sharp corner where people would go when heading south on Carrollton and are turning to get on the westbound Interstate.

I have called the city of New Orleans traffic engineering department this week, and they have said that they have had complaints before, and would have to get with the company they contract line painting to in order to see if they have the budget for it. My question is why wasn’t the line painted when Carrollton was redone. They took it to the base in many areas to build up a good base before resurfacing and relining–much of it with additional lines for bike traffic.

My suggestion, would be to have the right lane go to the first two full lanes plus the shoulder. This way all interstate traffic should be in the right lane. Why? First, because we want to encourage the ability for vehicles to drive fast enough to clear out the area from the Washington St. split to Carrollton, and at that speed we already see vehicles going partially into the second lane. Second, according to the wear visible in the image, a majority of the traffic in the right lane is already going only to the interstate, and the next lane in is mostly going strait across Carrollton. Thus any traffic going to Carrollton is minimal and can split between the shortest of the two right turning lanes.

Edit tags

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, The road | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Merging – Come on Guys lets zipper!

Ok, this is the first of a series of driving posts. Whether its comments on driving habits and getting it off my chest, or suggestions on road improvements.

See view from street at the bottom of post

Where do these people learn to merge?
Part 1 of 2:
This all started with some guy stopping to merge. I was going down Claiborne on the ramp/bridge over Earheart/the tracks on the interchange with I-10/the Crescent City Connection/Poydras-Approximately 1100 S. Claiborne Ave, 70113, and this guy had his blinker on. I slow enough to let him in, and he stops. Swell, now he is holding up several people, and has to wait for a couple dozen cars coming out of the light at MLK Boulevard.

He has the whole shoulder ahead to stop in. There was no debris. Instead, he’s blocking the ramp, holding up traffic, and increasing the possibility of a wreck of at least a couple dozen cars. The rule is what is the safest move. Its generally accepted that you can overflow to the shoulder if necessary when merging, but do not count on it.         …. Its Considered an emergency maneuver.  NOTE: if he would have merged, he could have easily gotten in front of me rather than stopping. i.e. match speed and get into the lane.

Quote from: lowestpricetrafficschool.com
All expressway entrances have three basic parts: an entrance ramp, an acceleration lane, and a merging area. Follow these guidelines to enter an expressway safely:

* On the entrance ramp, begin checking for an opening in traffic. Signal for your turn.
* As the ramp straightens into the acceleration lane, speed up. Try to adjust your speed so that you can move into the traffic when you reach the end of the acceleration lane.
* Merge into traffic when you can do so safely. You must yield the right-of-way to traffic on the expressway. You cannot always count on other drivers moving over to give you room to enter, but do not stop on an acceleration lane unless traffic is too heavy and there is no space for you to enter safely.

Merge defined by dictionary.reference.com

1. to cause to combine or coalesce; unite. [edit: i.e. two lanes of traffic]
4. to combine or unite into a single enterprise, organization, body, etc.: The two firms merged last year.  [Edit: Single Lane / Flow of traffic]

MORE on merging….. Part 2 of 2

http://jeffcaylor.com/2008/09/19/i-dont-know-everything-the-zipper-merge/

Posted in Complaints and suggestions, The road | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

More on merging…. The Zipper

I just posted regarding matching the the speed, and not stopping on the ramp or lane you are moving from.

However, we must continue on a similar subject…. The Zipper. Just like the zipper on clothes, we are bringing together two hard objects.
With clothes, its the teeth, and with traffic, its cars and trucks.
See how the zipper almost looks like a road below

Here is what you are supposed to do. You are supposed to match the speed of the lane you are trying to merge into. The vehicles in the lane you are moving into are to make reasonable accommodations to assist your merge.

This means if you are the one merging, should try and match the speed as soon as reasonably possible.  When I say as soon as reasonably possible, keep in mind that:

  1. minimizing the difference in speed is the safest.
  2. gunning it is not energy efficient — yea this goes out to you that wait to the end to try and match your speed.
  3. Start speeding up early; cutting in when you have not matched speed with the traffic in the lane you are moving to is EXTREMELY UNSAFE, and causes everyone else to use extra energy because you didn’t start speeding up early enough. twelve people losing a tenth of a gallon because you wanted to save a couple tenths still loses half a gallon to the oil tycoones, and higher gas prices (so you didn’t save anything).
  4. Use the shoulder to overshoot if necessary and safe to do so. Remember this is an emergency procedure. If you have to do this often, you need to start planning better when you need to merge, and possibly get the word out on proper merge etiquette/procedures. Oh and get people to stop doing #5
  5. Stop jumping the line. It pisses people off, and ends up hurting us all when people start not letting people in. Plus, pissed off people then piss you off, and both sides end up in a pissing power match that may end up with some sort of road rage.

This concept of merging works well anytime there is a merge. Getting on a highway, lane ends, construction, accidents, evacuations, major events (sports/concerts/etc.)

I have found several links supporting this, however without going past the first page of a google search, most mainly discuss closed lanes due to construction:

http://ask.metafilter.com/17966/Merging-Traffic-Lanes
Posted in Complaints and suggestions, The road | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment